I came across this page where you can find a lot of energizers, games and other facilitation techniques: https://www.sessionlab.com/library/energiser
Toby’s Virtual Facilitation Toolkit
Facilitating Virtual Training and Workshops?
Here is a collection of exercises, techniques and approaches in Toby’s toolkit.
Remote Teams and Virtual Facilitation
Interesting article from Ram Srinivasan with some great tips on working with distributed teams, including research why having co-located teams is better can be found: https://www.scrum.org/resources/blog/remote-teams-and-virtual-facilitation
Here are my major takeaways.
- Facilitator tip – Rather than merely trying to replicate a technique that works for in-person meetings, try to deconstruct why that technique works and reconstruct that technique for virtual meetings
- Participate in the virtual meeting with the same level of attention (or more) and engagement as though it is an in-person meeting (that means no multi-tasking)
- There is a self-fulfilling prophecy with regard to virtual meetings – you experience poor virtual meetings, you expect bad meetings, you get bad meetings, and the cycle perpetuates itself
- Set expectations upfront – very clearly and this is how you break the self-fulfilling prophecy
- Ban phone only meetings, use videos for ALL the meetings.
- People get a lot of cues when seeing the face and having a video helps in non-verbal communication, not to mention that it actually engages people
- Have you heard the toilet flushing sound when in conference calls(because someone forgot to mute their phone)? Bet you will not hear that when you have your participants turn on the video.
- You got to be on the video, else we close the meeting right away. You join on video, else you don’t. Period.
- You got to join the meeting from a quiet place, not “dial-in” it from the bus when you are on your way home. And you must be on the video. Period.
- Even if one person breaks the expectations once, we close the meeting right away. We break it once, it is an excuse to break it the second time and we are back with the self-fulfilling prophecy of bad virtual meetings
- Ban phone only meetings, use videos for ALL the meetings.
- Normalize the communication channels – One person is remote? Then everyone is joining remotely using their own video from their laptop. Two people cannot join using the same video. Don’t have a camera? GET ONE !!
- Facilitator and participant tip – try having the video right below the camera (than having the video on a different screen) in your laptops/computer. It creates an impression that you are looking into the camera when you are looking into the video
- In-person meetings and co-located teams work because we “socialize” quite a bit. Try having some “social” time in virtual meetings as well. Try “bring your own cider” (the choice of drink will depend on the timezone of the participants)
- As a facilitator, you got to have everyone engaged – here are a few tips
- Get everyone on video.
- This minimizes the participants’ tendency to multi-task
- This also prevents people from anonymously snooping in. Have you had people join a conference call and not announce themselves? Will you let someone walk into your in-person meeting with a mask on? If no, why would you have someone snoop into your virtual meeting?
- Avoid PowerPoints – it is just one-way broadcast. Use tools that support “virtual” break-out rooms.
- Increase psychological safety (more on this in a different blog later) so that people can actually speak up.
- Get everyone on video.
- Facilitator tips –
- Like my friend Mike Dwyer says – use the NOSTUESO rule – No One Speaks Twice Until Everyone Speaks Once. And the participant has the right to pass. This creates space for people to speak up. Also, if participants speak up in the first five minutes, they are much more likely to speak again.
- Hard to pass a talking stick and figuring out who should talk next in a virtual meeting when facilitating round-robin discussion – try this idea – Have a participant speak and then nominate the next person. And repeat till everyone speaks
- Prepare… prepare… prepare. You cannot wing a virtual meeting. You need more preparation. And you need a Plan B as well. What if the internet connection fails? What if your laptop crashes?
- Pay attention to discomfort – participants can only sit in once place for so long
- Bring psychological safety and engagement from everyone into the working agreement. What might be the few ways that we damage psychological safety (sometimes unconsciously)?
- Have someone paraphrase what a speaker said. This makes people pay more attention and also ensures that the speaker’s message landed as intended
- If appropriate, use tools like https://www.mentimeter.com/ or https://kahoot.com/ to increase engagement during the meeting by having participants answer questions.
- When women speak first, the probability that other women speak is higher.
- Remote meetings are a lot smaller than in-person meetings. It is hard to have more than 12 people in a virtual meeting (and then expect them to be engaged). If you are new start with six, then build up.
Hoe je zorgt dat je enthousiasme gedeeld wordt
Weet je wat ‘the rule of ⅓’ is?
Het
is een principe dat werkt op basis van groepsdynamiek en peer pressure.
Als je een derde van een groep weet te overtuigen gaat de rest van de
groep altijd mee.
Misschien herken je het wel: Je bent naar een theatervoorstelling geweest. Het was best een leuke voorstelling, maar niet de allerbeste die je ooit gezien hebt. Als de voorstelling is afgelopen begint iedereen te applaudisseren. Op de voorste rij staan zelfs een paar mensen op voor een staande ovatie. Dan volgen er achter hen meer mensen die gaan staan. Links en rechts van je staan ook wat mensen op. Terwijl het klappen doorgaat staan er steeds meer mensen op in de zaal. En dan ineens: sta jij ook op. Hoe kan dat? Wat is er gebeurd?!
Dit is het effect van ‘the rule of ⅓’. Doordat meer dan een derde van de zaal staat, ga jij onbewust ook staan om erbij te horen.
Dit
principe kun jij ook inzetten in jouw meetings. Als je zorgt dat je op
voorhand al wat mensen hebt geïnformeerd en geënthousiasmeerd over je
plannen zul je zien dat je daar profijt van hebt. Als deze mensen met
voorkennis hun enthousiasme delen zullen de anderen in de ruimte ook
eerder geneigd zijn om enthousiast te reageren.
Hoe zorg je dat je enthousiasme gedeeld wordt?
Heel
simpel eigenlijk: Vraag het de mensen. Niet als een random vraag. Maar
vraag het heel direct aan een van de mensen van wie je weet wat ze ervan
vinden. Na het positieve antwoord vraag je nog eens direct een van de
andere positievelingen. Je zult zien dat de vibe nu positief is waardoor
het lastiger wordt om de negatieve ideeën te spuien.
Twijfel
je of het werkt? Probeer het maar eens. En… Wees je ervan bewust dat
wanneer jij de conversatie niet leidt, iemand anders het wel doet. The
rule of ⅓ werkt helaas ook andersom. Als de negatievelingen (die vaak
automatisch als eerste hun mond opentrekken, wat is dat toch met hen?!)
als eerste hun negatieve opmerkingen delen wordt het lastiger om de vibe
positief te krijgen.
Is er dan helemaal geen ruimte voor negativiteit?
Tuurlijk
wel! Maar zorg ook dat je dit stuurt: Vraag eerst heel specifiek wat
men positief aan het idee of de presentatie vindt. Op deze manier train
je de aanwezige breinen om meer positiviteit te zien. Vraag daarna pas
naar verbeterpunten. Niet naar slechte punten! Ga uit van het feit dat
het een goed idee is (je kunt dit zelfs zo benoemen) en dat je nog zoekt
naar punten om het idee nóg beter te maken.
Deze aanpak is zo makkelijk, voor je het weet staat iedereen op voor een staande ovatie. 😉 Het is nou eenmaal leuker om dingen samen te doen. Zo simpel werkt het.
Wil je jouw meetings, sessies en andere interacties nog beter leren vormgeven en anderen om je heen leren activeren, inspireren en motiveren? Schrijf je dan in voor het allereerste digitale live workshop programma van Nederland: ‘AIM: Word een Superfacilitator’. Geef je hier op.
Facilitation Canvas
Anthony Boobier created the Facilitation Canvas as a tool to help facilitators prepare to run a session. He uses it as part of their ICAgile team facilitator course. The canvas is made up of 8 boxes, each with an associated set of prompt questions that I have found work well as a guide when filling it out.
Read all about it here: https://medium.com/path-pattern/the-retrospective-a-known-recipe-for-improvement-with-my-own-spice-da534c6628cc
Health checks for Teams and Leadership
In this blog post, Jimmy Janlén wants to share a powerful tool, the Leadership Health Check. It will help you become stronger as a management team and reveal improvement opportunities for how you, as a team of active servant leaders, better can enable the agile teams you support.
You can find the blog post here: https://blog.crisp.se/2019/03/11/jimmyjanlen/health-checks-for-teams-and-leadership
Liberating What?
A great introduction to Liberating Structures can be found here: https://medium.com/@jelrikvh/liberating-what-36e8d511cb89
Liberating Structures in practice: The UX Fishbowl
Shift your perspective and see an experience through someone else’s eyes.
In this first part of the Liberating Structures in practice series, Jelrik van Hal outlines practical examples of how he used the UX Fishbowl in the wild.
Read the article here: https://medium.com/@jelrikvh/liberating-structures-in-practice-the-ux-fishbowl-8048ee6282f2
Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There!
A nice summary of the book Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There! can be found in the presentation Working with Teams from Karolina Ozadowicz that can be found here: https://prezi.com/w0jqbiy-f582/working-with-teams/
The Scrum Master Checklist
This site is dedicated to Michael James’ Example Scrum Master Checklist, an example list of things a Scrum Master should pay attention to in a typical organization. Check it out at http://scrummasterchecklist.org/