Carsten Lützen created a lot of introduction videos that can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDvr4dS873jCpYDCEtBBW8g/videos
Some exampels of these video’s are:
Just a site where I archive interesting reads I've encountered online
Carsten Lützen created a lot of introduction videos that can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDvr4dS873jCpYDCEtBBW8g/videos
Some exampels of these video’s are:
Ideally, teams get the chance to select their own members, organize a kickoff and define a strategy to reach the given goal. Most of the time teams are created top-down and there’s no time available for a decent kickoff. Teams just start with the realisation of the project and everything seems to be going smoothly. But when the first serious impediments arise the foundation of the team will be tested. Teams with a solid foundation will also struggle in the beginning but survive and become stronger than before. Teams without this foundation might also survive after a harsh period, but chances are they fall apart and the project is killed and the team dissolved.
The first step in becoming a solid team is establishing a solid foundation. This foundation consists of a shared vision about teamwork and the required quality standards.
For this purpose, creating a team manifesto is the ideal instrument. It is an agreed way of working among the team members that ensures mutual understanding. Years ago I got inspired by this blog post, since then I’ve changed it slightly to fit new insights. With every team I start, creating the team manifest is the first thing I do, success guaranteed!
The steps are:
The same exercise can be done by posing the team the question ‘what does quality mean to you?’ This creates awareness about the required quality and stimulates craftsmanship.
What are the advantages of creating a team manifesto? Read the full article here: https://medium.com/the-liberators/the-team-manifesto-the-foundation-every-team-needs-c1d72ccfe689
Have you noticed your organization becoming so focused on building a happy, engaged workforce that your leaders are becoming profoundly conflict-avoidant? I see examples of this all the time. One clue that your team is avoiding conflict is if the least bit of discomfort in a meeting causes someone to suggest that you “take it offline.” This, of course, triggers the meeting-after-the-meeting phenomenon — another hallmark of a conflict-avoidant culture.
You can normalize productive conflict on your team by using an exercise to map out the unique value of each role and the tensions that should exist among them. Here’s how. Draw a circle and divide that circle into enough wedges to represent each role on your team. For each role, ask:
1) What is the unique value of this role on this team? What should this person be paying attention to that no one else is? What would we miss if this role wasn’t here?
2) On which stakeholders is this role focused? Whom does it serve? Who defines success?
3) What is the most common tension this role puts on team discussions? What one thing does the person in this role have to say that frequently makes others bristle?
Read the complete article and other intersting articles related to handling conflict here: https://hbr.org/2017/04/how-self-managed-teams-can-resolve-conflict
The purpose of Improv Prototyping is to re-enact a challenging scenario faced by a group or an individual and work together to devise different behavioural strategies and interventions by acting it out. The twist that this structure brings is that the person who introduced the scenario becomes the ‘director’, while the others become the ‘actors’. This allows the director to playfully experiment with strategies, behaviours and interventions.
Read the complete article here: https://medium.com/the-liberators/playful-learning-with-improv-prototyping-18dc4ab4a304
Hoe ziet een Agile Release Train (ART) er eigenlijk uit, en wat is een ART als je het hebt over SAFe? De stappen die de Agile Scrum Group beschrijven vertellen je wat een Agile Release Train is en wat er nodig is om een ART op stoom te brengen.
Leees de complete blog-post hier: https://agilescrumgroup.nl/agile-release-train/
MindMeld is a microstructure still in development, which means it’s not yet part of the 33 in the LS menu, but it is a promising one in the works. MindMeld is a combination of forming Mindmaps by using the structure What, So What, Now What? (W3). Saskia Vermeer-Ooms has used W3 several times and she thinks it is a powerful structure to use when you need your audience to come up with concrete actions of a certain challenge. You do this by first taking two other steps in which you take the time to observe the data available before drawing conclusions and moving into action mode.
Read about her experience with MindMeld in this post: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trying-out-mindmeld-liberating-structure-saskia-vermeer-ooms/
You can find all talks of the DevOps Summit Amsterdam within Xebia’s DevOps playlist on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC3RVtNPazW__NQyvhMFnu0-cBZLfkiUJ
DevOps is all of the following:
Bill Kleyman made a list of the top 5 mistakes organizations make while deploying DevOps:
Read the complete blogpost here: https://www.informationweek.com/devops/getting-devops-wrong-top-5-mistakes-organizations-make/a/d-id/1333173
DevOps is not about tools and automation in the delivery pipeline. In fact, as we have learned tools and automation is only one-third of DevOps. In overall, DevOps is about Collaboration & Collective Ownership, Focus on the flow of value delivery and Learning and experimentation culture. But sadly, many tooling vendors position DevOps as tools and process for the delivery pipeline. This will get the management excited because many managers think that after buying and installing the “DevOps” tools without changing their organisation will make their company instantly agile. This is like putting the cart in front of the horse.
In this
Read about it here: https://medium.com/the-ready/the-os-canvas-8253ac249f53