The Reading List for Agile Newbies

Barry Overeem created a list of must-reads for agile newbies:

  • The Agile Manifesto
  • The Scrum Guide – Jeff Sutherland, Ken Schwaber
  • The Power of Scrum – Rini van Solingen
  • Scrum: A Pocket Guide – Gunther Verheyen
  • Succeeding with Agile – Mike Cohn
  • The Agile Samurai – Jonathan Rasmusson
  • The Five Dysfunctions of a Team – Patrick Lencioni
  • The Scrum Field Guide – Mitch Lacey
  • The Phoenix Project – Gene Kim, Kevin Behr, George Spafford
  • Kanban – David J. Anderson
  • Clean Code – Robert C. Martin

Read his complete blogpost here: http://www.barryovereem.com/the-reading-list-for-agile-newbies/

Six Agile Product Development Myths – Busted

In this article Mike Cohn busts six agile product development myths:

  • Myth #1: Isn’t Agile Just for Software Development?
  • Myth #2: Is It True That Managers Have No Role in Agile?
  • Myth #3: Can’t Stakeholders Introduce Change Whenever They Want?
  • Myth #4: Doesn’t Everyone Need to Be a Generalist on an Agile Team?
  • Myth #5: I’ve Heard that Agile Teams Don’t (or Can’t) Plan.
  • Myth #6: Don’t Agile Teams Create Products with No Architectural Plan?

Find the complete article here: https://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/blog/six-agile-product-development-myths-busted

Five Fundamental Questions to Assess your Agile Process

Barry Overeem writes about the five fundamental questions to assess you agile process in this article: https://medium.com/the-liberators/five-fundamental-questions-to-assess-your-agile-process-376b9230c7d8

  1. Value. Do we know the value we seek to deliver and are we consistently delivering the maximum value?
  2. Flow. Do we understand how we reach that value and are we consistently reducing the time and/or increasing the ease by which we reach it?
  3. Quality. Do we understand how good our product and workmanship needs to be and are we consistently and demonstrably achieving it?
  4. Joy. Do we know what we collectively and individually need to be joyful and are we consistently meeting those needs?
  5. Continuous Improvement. Do we know what we need to improve across value, flow, quality and joy and are we demonstrably pursuing those improvements?

7 Key Factors for Scaling Agile in Large Organizations

Agile adoption has grown from a small number of agile teams within an organization to many agile teams, larger teams, and entire organizations themselves, bringing a new set of challenges and complexities. Regardless of the framework, some important factors play a major role in making large-scale agile adoption successful. Here are seven aspects you should consider when scaling agile across an organization.

  1. Executive leadership support
  2. Knowledge acquisition
  3. Engineering excellence
  4. Tools and infrastructure
  5. Communities of practice
  6. Integrating nonsoftware teams
  7. Agile champions and change agents

Read the complete article here: https://www.agileconnection.com/article/7-key-factors-scaling-agile-large-organizations

Common or severe Agile mistakes

Mike Cohn from mountaingoatsoftware.com mailed a nice list of common agile mistakes:

Being way too ambitious in how much work was selected for the next iteration. A few people reported doing this even in the absence of management pressure to do so.

Trying to facilitate a meeting using someone else’s style. We each have our own style. Use that. Teams recognize when we’re pretending we’re someone else and facilitating with their style.

Holding meetings or other events at the wrong times. A few people reported doing sprint reviews a few days early, but then not having everything ready to demonstrate.

Telling people what to do. This seemed like a common problem, especially for any of us who worked as traditional project managers before adopting an agile approach. Other Scrum Masters reported the opposite problem, saying they remained too silent during team discussions.

Letting a story into the sprint without enough clarity about what was needed. A few people emailed that this happened because a product owner pushed for the story to be included. Others, though, said it was the team that wanted to bring the story in despite a lack of clarity.

Trying to fill every hour with planned work during sprint planning. Some teams fear an unallocated hour. When sprint planning seems done but a few people have extra hours, they planned work into those hours and then learned they’d overloaded the sprint.

Not asking enough questions. A couple of Scrum Masters said they didn’t ask enough questions. I’m pretty good at that by now, but early on, I would literally track the number of questions I asked versus the number of statements I made in each meeting to try to improve.

Forgoing the usual meetings because the team size was small. A few people replied to say they took the already-lightweight Scrum framework and lightened it further by leaving out some meetings because their teams were 2-3 people. They learned this was a mistake and that even small teams benefit from every Scrum event.

Not pushing teams a little harder at improvements they’d decided to make. In their retrospectives, some teams chose to improve at things like demonstrating to users more often or improving collaboration between coders and testers. And a few of you said you didn’t push your teams hard enough to make the improvements they’d chosen themselves.

Allowing too much discussion into the daily scrum. A few Scrum Masters and coaches emailed to say they changed the format of the daily scrum away from the standard three questions, and that didn’t work as well. Other said they let teams discuss problems too long and daily scrums started to take much longer. Another had let the daily scrum turn into a design meeting.

Not letting go of a mistake. A number of people said that they tend to replay mistakes in their heads or let mistakes gnaw at them. Once the mistake has been made, learn from it. Then let it go.